The Ravages of Age

I was eating a bowl of Quisp last night when I noticed that one of them had a black thing on it. It was probably just a small burnt speck from the cooking process, but I had a bad experience with cereal bugs in high school, so I wanted to be sure. I lifted the piece of cereal out of the bowl to get a closer look, and it went all blurry. Confused, I pulled it back a little. It went in focus. Close up: blurry. Out farther: in focus.

Dang.

I have suspected this was happening, but now I think it’s confirmed: my near-vision is blurring. It certainly isn’t glasses time yet, but anything closer than three inches from my eyes starts to lose focus. No more extreme close-up looking for me.

The black thing was indeed a small burnt speck. I ate it.

This entry was posted in Journal. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to The Ravages of Age

  1. Lauren says:

    I don’t think it’s you – I think your camera needs glasses.

  2. Beth says:

    Embrace the Dadness!

  3. Deanne says:

    We’re not 18 anymore… but we’re still fabulous!!

  4. Lloyd says:

    Yeah. Yeah. Your eyes get blurry. I think the real question here is, “How did you get the camera’s eye to do the same thing?”.*

  5. Peggy says:

    Don’t you already wear glasses?

    Hehe … I don’t … I got something right with me … I got something right with me …

  6. Carol says:

    The designer reading glasses are “where it’s at”, Brad, and the Dollar Stores have kept me going in them for years already – you’ll be fine. You might seek out the Ben Franklin half-glass – very sophisticated IMHO.

    And you might not need them every day for every event. I flew without a net at Advent this morning and read the entire “bridge” script for the puppet shows without mine because I left the purse on the bus. Great natural lighting notwithstanding, I was pretty dnag proud of myself.

    You’ll probably get even more respect once you are a regular glasses wearer, too. Not that this has ever worked in my case…

  7. Brent says:

    If you can focus on things 3 inches (8 cm) from your face then your eyes are freakishly good:

    http://www.cune.edu/facweb/brent.royuk/temp/npa.jpg

    My near point is about 17 cm.

    • Brad says:

      Ha! Leave it to you to find a geeky graph about this! I mis-estimated earlier. My focus point is more like 5.5 inches, or 15 cm. That puts me in normal range, I guess.

      I do feel better about it, though. Thanks.

      Do you suppose that if we drop into the grey area on the graph we must become Presbyterian? Are Mom and Dad Presbyterians?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>